![]() ![]() |
|||
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
****NATA Safety 1st Program and Other NATA News --------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ One advertisement is a testimonial from three of our original NATA Safety 1st participants. Told from their perspective, it reviews the “win-win” advantages of the program. You will see different versions of the ad in upcoming pilot magazines and hopefully at your facility. As we noted in the last e-Line, the January/February 2001 Airport Business had an article relevant to line service written by Tom Slavin, President of Million Air - Cleveland. NATA reproduced portions of the article to promote the benefits and merits of the program. It is an excellent overview of the NATA Safety 1st Program and its impact on the aviation industry. The NATA Safety 1st logo was featured on the back cover of the golf booklet for the Greater St. Louis Business Aircraft Association Memorial Open. The NATA Safety 1st program was one of many aviation businesses to sponsor this charitable event; a portion of the proceeds go to the Wings of Hope. This popular golf event has brought area aviation businesses together for the past 25 years. The NATA Safety 1st Program will exhibit at the Florida Aviation Trades Association (FATA) Annual Meeting and Trade Show in Naples, Florida from June 11-13th. FATA brings many Florida aviation managers and executives together. Featuring the benefits of NATA Safety 1st will continue to bring additional Florida FBOs into the program. The LSST will be held at the conclusion of the show on June 14 & 15th. The NATA Safety 1st Program has expanded its partnership with the Valley Oil Company, Inc. LLC. Valley sent Safety 1st applications to all of their direct dealers to show their support of the program. Many of the dealers have signed up and continue to do so. Valley is taking the NATA Safety Program a step further. All of Valley’s sales team members will take the Safety 1st tests this summer. Wow, Safety 1st will look forward to welcoming all of Valley’s sales force to the program! Another first for the program! …Stay tuned for future updates. ~~~~~~~~~~~~
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ We hope you had a chance to join us in Long Beach for AS3- Aviation Services and Suppliers Supershow and the NATA Convention. From our perspective, it was a great convention. It’s a nice time to experience all the latest technology in aviation business, take advantage of a number of educational sessions and to network with all the wonderful NATA members. Our appreciation goes out to all of you who attended.
Million Air - Cleveland was selected for the award because of its commitment to providing quality line service and encouraging fueling safety. They also hold the distinction of being the first NATA Safety 1st participant to complete line service testing. In addition, the Burke Lakefront FBO is currently in the process of insuring quality control by securing ISO 9001 certification. Tom Slavin stated in accepting the award, “With the consequences of non compliance so evident, our goal must be “zero tolerance” for errors and omissions by line service. We, at Million Air - Cleveland, take this challenge to both our heart and mind - everyday.” NATA Safety 1st participant, Midcoast Aviation, has designed a safety vest for all their line service technicians. (Note the NATA Safety 1st logo!) All the Midcoast facilities are wearing the vests including Lambert, Parks and Little Rock airports. The idea was brought about during safety discussions with Midcoast line service. Not only are the vests worn proudly by the line techs, but pilots are very keen on them since they can easily spot line service. Gary Driggers, Executive Vice President & COO of Midcoast Aviation, brought the vests to AS3 and the NATA Business Management Committee meeting in Long Beach. Several NATA Safety 1st participants have expressed an interest in ordering vests for their line service. Without a volume discount, the vests retail for approximately $25 each. If enough participants want vests, NATA will try to secure a discounted price. Please email Amy Koranda with the number you would like to order. We will get back with you in the very near future. We recently met Terry Wilcoxson, Operations Manager for Fliteline Services at the LSST in Long Beach. Fliteline Services participates in the NATA Safety 1st program and takes line service seriously. Terry created a website called clearandbright.com. If you haven’t been to this site before, go now! It is a valuable resource for all line service operations to bookmark. Included on the site are links and information pertaining to ATA 103, FAR 139, NFPA 407, fire extinguishing principles, fuel quality, audits, hazwoper, M & O Manuals, SPCC and additional line service links and resources. Great job Terry! If you’d like to share something with other NATA Safety 1st participants, send an email to Amy Koranda with information and/or pictures for the NATA e-Line and website. In the last e-Line, we asked you to share safety information
or statistics about how the NATA Safety 1st Program has impacted your
business. Please keep information coming our way! We really think you
are doing a great job of keeping those lines safe. As part of this e-Line, we will include an educational
article. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Its embarrassing and frustrating to learn that a life-long belief is incorrect or in some way not founded on scientific facts. When I was very small, my parents refused to let me go swimming for an hour after I had lunch - leg cramps would surely get me. Two hundred years ago people would not eat tomatoes because they were known to be poisonous. The earth was once known to be flat. And now we are faced here in America with the proven fact that grounding an aircraft to get rid of electrostatic charges caused by refueling is not the safest way to deal with the problem. The rest of the world, and our own scientific community has somehow known this for years but it wasn't until two years ago that we had to face the facts when the National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) issued their most recent revision of Bulletin 407 on August 17,1990. It was a complete reversal; after having specified grounding as well as bonding between the fuel servicing vehicle and the aircraft since the 1960's, they said it was safer not to ground. Let's examine the issue and try to understand why NFPA made this astonishing change. When an aircraft is being fueled, an electrostatic charge develops that can discharge and cause a fire if fuel vapors are also present. The primary cause of the electrostatic charge is the filtering equipment, usually on a truck or hydrant servicer. And now you are saying -- "but charges can develop without filtering and are caused by pumping or by the fuel passing through pipes and valves". And you are correct-- BUT the real culprit by a factor of 100 to 1 is the filter, monitor or filter separator. Let's think about what an electrostatic charge really is. Basically, it is pluses ++++) that are physically separated from minuses (- - -). If you connect a wire or any other conductor between those 2 places, a current flows and the pluses immediately cancel the minuses so that no net charge remains. So now let's think about what happens during fueling. Flow begins through the filter with a separation of the pluses and the minuses. One or the other (pluses or minuses) go along with the fuel into the aircraft and the other stays behind in the filter creating a large voltage difference. If the fuel was a conductor, this would not happen. The charges in the filter travel, in time, to the filter vessel casing and into the vehicle frame. The charges that are carried away in the fuel to the aircraft will migrate to the airframe. And now what do you have? You have the truck all charged up with minuses and the airplane all charged up with pluses (or vice versa). You could ground the truck and get rid of that charge. You could ground the aircraft and get rid of that charge. When there is no voltage difference, there is no charge. A better way to deal with the whole problem is simply to connect the truck and the airplane together with a bonding wire. Now the pluses on the airplane go back to the truck to cancel the minuses and you have no net charge. The practice in the USA has been to bond and ground but recent tests have proven that if the aircraft and the truck are bonded, a grounding wire carries no charge at all. This is why NFPA 407 no longer specifies grounding for safety during aircraft fueling. NFPA does not mean that an aircraft should not be grounded for electrical reasons or for maintenance. Personnel who have those responsibilities must make their own decisions about grounding and provide the PROPER SIZE of cable for their purposes. A typical cable used for electrostatic grounding is usually far too small to satisfy electrical grounding needs and, in fact, some have simply melted right under the aircraft where fuel vapors could be ignited. This can happen when the aircraft electrical system or the ground power unit/generator malfunction. This was a further reason for NFPA 407 to delete the electrostatic ground wire. You may be thinking now that the bonding can be eliminated if the fuel has been made conductive by adding a conductivity improver. That is surely not a good idea because the fuel can never be as good a conductor as a wire. You might also argue that now that NFPA 407 specifies hose with a conductive cover, this constitutes a bond between the truck and the aircraft. NFPA 407 specifically forbids this because the wire makes a superior bond. The conductive cover provides an added factor of safety - just in case. In conclusion, you absolutely must bond the aircraft to the source of fuel where the final filter is located. The source may be a refueler truck, hydrant servicer or a cabineted fueling station! Grounding can become a hazard if the cable is insufficient
to carry the power from electrical apparatus such as a ground power unit
or generator. Check out what clearandbright.com has to say about bonding. This section will help you with the paperwork and study
process. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Thank you for your commitment to line service safety...
|
|||